The "marketing problem" -- what do we do?
In a long high-tech career I've had lots of involvement with marketing types. I've learned that nearly everyone with real-life experience and preparation...or even without it...has strong opinions about smart marketing. Based on what I've seen in the business world, I believe smart and intensive marketing is the key place where UM has whipped our tails for the past 40+ years, and it then trickles into recruiting and in-season successes and failures.
We can also see how ESPN, for example, has become a non-paid (or let's assume we can trust that it's non-paid for now) marketing channel for the SEC and Big 12 in football, and the ACC and Big East in hoops. Their current ESPN "College Football" program has currently come close to promoting that there is no life beyond the SEC, and maybe the Big 12. And, the Florida cheer-leading for months now is completely over the top.
Getting back to the state of Michigan, UM to me represents a far less appealing place and attitude than MSU. But, it has, nonetheless, given MSU a consistent marketing whipping since the discipline began to get increasingly sophisticated in the late '60s. I could speculate on the reasons out of my own experience and past life in Michigan. But, I'm more curious why Spartan-nation participants here and in other forums seem to ignore the problem. It's particularly baffling to me with tens of thousands of business degrees delivered by MSU to the state's residents, and with the humongous body of knowledge that represents. So, I'm curious what keeps the issue in passive mode.
Will Mark Hollis, who is making improvements, get this thing turned around? If you have a strong marketing background or just strong opinions about how this issue seems to continue, can you jump in here? Let's get this puppy solved at least in the Great Lakes region where we can recruit well. What do you think?
