Michigan’s high court has spoken: It doesn’t like it when someone secretly records their conversations – even if it’s one of their own.
This week, a majority of the Michigan Supreme Court censured one its former colleagues, former Justice Elizabeth Weaver, for revealing last month that she had secretly recorded some of the court’s private deliberations.
She went on to blast Justice Robert Young Jr., while he was facing a heated election challenge, for making what she believed were racially charged and insensitive comments during deliberations.
Justices who supported the censure said that Weaver never asked permission to tape the sessions – and they would have denied permission.
Weaver, for her part, says she merely was exercising her right to free speech, and that the court violated the Code of Judicial Conduct in issuing her censure because the Judicial Tenure Commission had issued no recommendation.
Of course, in this age of digital media, secret audio recordings seem lame. Where’s the video? Where are the YouTube uploads?
Seems like it would be easy enough to hide a small Flip camera in the flowing folds of a black gown. What say you, justices?



Recent Comments