• Jean Friend
    St. Johns resident
    Belinda Thurston
    Assistant Managing Editor
    Stepheni L. Schlinker
    AARP Associate State
    Director for Communications

    Jim Waun
    East Lansing resident

-ADVERTISEMENT-

Blog powered by TypePad

« Christmas Blog | Main | Cat gifts, German Movies and Baby Layettes »

December 26, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c83bd53ef00e54fc6c02c8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Health Care Myths:

Comments

bob deehan

Jim Waun apparently refers to the discredited WHO (World Health Organization) rankings. WHO, a corrupt U.N. organ, heavily skews its rankings of countries on the basis of whether or not that country has government-run health systems, i.e. socialist=good, free-enterprise or mixed systems=bad. About 2/7 of their rating is based on universal (read taxpayer paid) health services being a positive, whereas countries without taxpayer supported systems are penalized for not having such. Why is that even a consideration? There is no corelation to the actual quality of care whatsoever, which should be the primary comparative factor. Additionally, Waun claims 1/3rd of health care costs come from insurance profits and overhead without offering any supporting statistical evidence to support his statement. If such a claim were true, is Waun asserting that a government-run system would cost less? If so, can he name one other government-run system worldwide that cost less, considering the taxes to operate it and the outcomes after that governments' health rationing system is factored in?

Dave

Bob, Amen he also must have a mental block that he believes that congress and other government agency's which can not manage the programs we have now ie Medicare, Social Security, and the Welfare Program. As well as the fact that in France Socializism is on the way out because it just doesn't work due to greed in leadership.

jim waun

I do not advocate a government-run health care system, and I tried to make that clear in the last paragraph of my blog. From over 50 years of working in health care, I know very well the disastrous results from commercial (primarily) and government mismanagement of health-related matters.

I advocate a completely free enterprise health-care system, with competition based on quality, outcomes and consumer satisfaction. In order to be as free as reasonably possible, free enterprise health-care must be monitored and regulated by an independent, apolitical body of health care professionals, like the Federal Reserve economics professionals (imperfectly but independently) regulates free-enterprise banking entities.

I say free health care from domination by insurance and drug and medical device manufacturers so that health care professionals can do their jobs and be accountable to the American people.

Let's keep the conversation going.

Jim

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Want to comment on a blog?

  • Three simple steps:
    1. Scroll to the bottom of the post page.
    2. Enter your name, e-mail address and comment into the empty fields.
    3. Click "Post" to publish your comment.

Contact the LSJ: